|
|
|
|
Waste Management and Climate Change
Current global rates of post-consumer waste generation are estimated to be 5%. Rates are on the rise especially in developing countries with rapid population growth, economic growth and urbanization. Fortunately, new and innovative waste management helps reduce solid waste disposal and subsequently reduce visual, respiratory, environmental and health impacts.
Waste can be treated using thermal, chemical, biological, physical and other processes in order
Landfill is a common way of disposing of solid waste, while liquid waste is often injected underground. Recent trend suggest rates peaking probably due to increasing awareness in 3R and revenue-oriented incentives through the CDM and JI. Engineered landfills provide a more environmentally acceptable waste-disposal strategy and accounts for 12% of the annual Certified Emissions Reduction (CER) credits issued in 2006, under the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol. For wastewater management, 90% of the population in developed countries but less than 30% in developing countries has improved sanitation. In addition to GHG reduction, improved sanitation and wastewater management provide a wide range of health and environmental co-benefits Integrated solid waste management uses a combination of options that emphasize: Hierarchy of Reduce, Reuse and Recycle ( 3R )
Landfilling releases methane which could either be harnessed (as is the trend now) or flared. Because methane is a much potent greenhouse gas, shifting its emissions to carbon dioxide emissions during flaring significantly reduces the greenhouse warming potential. Incineration, in the final stage of the waste management, creates more carbon-dioxide equivalent than landfilling. Such management emphasizes the recovery of more valuable products (e.g. valuable metals like gold, silver, indium from electronics wastes) from waste with minimum wastage of energy in the mitigation of global warming.
Pay As You Throw Certain countries like Japan, Australia, New Zealand implement revolutionary scheme of waste management called Pay As You Throw (Japan); Throw More, Pay More (Sydney). In common, solid wastes are charged according to their weight. Dumpers understand that the more they throw, the more they are charged; the less they throw, the less they are charged. In New Zealand, each house owner is entitled to 26 waste bags annually. The bags loaded with wastes must be securely tied and weigh no more than 15 kg each. Extra bags needed required to be purchased. These schemes create direct economic incentive to recycle more and to generate less wastes.
Reassessment of the Act was started in 2004, and the revised ACT effected in 2006:
How do the Japanese dump thrash? Myriads of waste classifications! When Oklahoma in Japan doubled the number of garbage categories to 10, it handed a 27-page booklet to brief its residents on how to sort their trash. Highlights include detailed instructions on 518 items. Take for example: Socks? If only one, it is burnable; a pair goes (only if the socks are not torn) into used cloth, and the left and right socks match. Neckties to be thrown into used cloth, but only after they have been washed and dried!
Waste management in Canada directly produces about 3.5% of the nation's total greenhouse-gas emissions, mainly from landfills. Recycling and composting divert about 25% of solid waste from disposal, the other 75% is disposed in landfill sites or burned in incinerators. Both result in the release of methane and nitrous oxide which are more potent than carbon dioxide in global warming.
References:
Recycling in Japan - the JCPRA Act
You are here: Home » Biogas » Biofuel » Landfill » Waste Management » Calculator » Carbon Offset » Sustainable You » Sustainability » Tribute to Chairman Chow
|
|