This crippled the cooling systems (in almost all 6 nuclear reactors) needed to keep nuclear fuel from going into full meltdown. That would cause the much feared nuclear explosions resulting in the release of radioactive radiations.
The nuclear accident was the worst since the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine in 1986, and the worst nuclear crisis in Japan since the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Unlike the Chernobyl explosion which happened in the midst of nuclear reaction; in Fukushima, three reactors were automatically shut down and the reaction stopped when the earthquake occurred. But the failure of the cooling systems in all the six nuclear reactors soon raised the temperatures and pressures rapidly, and to-date (17 March 2011), 4 reactors experienced explosions of different degrees at different stages.
![]() |
| CNN-Google picture showing: the 6 damaged nuclear plants in Fukushima, north-east of Tokyo. Crews have struggled to control since Japan's devastating earthquake and tsunami a week ago, amidst radiation fears in a country racing to avoid a full-on nuclear crisis. Latest fire was discovered Wednesday morning (17-March-2011) in the No. 4 reactor building at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. |
Prime Minister Kan said dangerous levels of radiation had spread from four reactors of the Fukushima nuclear plan. Other than the calls to increase the evacuation radius from 10 kms, then 20 kms and finally 30 kms from the epicenter of nuclear catastrophe, details of the information on the causes of nuclear failure, prevalent radiation levels and progress of rectification were limited.
People were frustrated and angry, doubting the level of transparency and fearing the worst case scenario of completely melt down, a disaster that could emit large amounts of radioactive contamination. Panic swept Tokyo after a rise in radiation levels of 40 times normal levels was recorded. Some locals, tourists and many foreigners scrambled to leave the country, while others stockpiled food and supplies. Multinational companies considered relocation outside Japan. Many countries imposed travel warning to Japan. Other precautionary measures taken included screening of travelers from Japan, testing of almost all Japanese food imports and banning of certain categories. Shipping industry has become increasingly nervous about sailing into the highly contaminated Japanese waters.
Nuclear experts have been warning that Japan was underplaying the severity of the nuclear crisis. Officials later admitted that at least 3% of the fuel in 3 reactors had been severely damaged, suggesting partial core melt-down. Japan on 18 march 2011 finally acknowledged the 'gravity and severity' of the nuclear crisis. Its nuclear rating agency raised the rating of the nuclear accident from Level 4 to Level 5 on a 7-level international scale. That put it on par with the 1979 Three Mile Island accident.
The International Nuclear Event Scale defines a Level 4 incident as having local consequences and a Level 5 as having wider consequences. This raised alarms at the neighboring countries like China, the Philippines, Korea, Russia, Hawaii and California. By the third week, radiations had been detected over these countries as these radiations drifted across territories.
These series of fires and explosions at the nuclear plants in Fukushima of Japan have revived doubts regarding the growth of nuclear power industry globally. The crisis has prompted many countries to boost safety checks at nuclear plants. European energy officials agreed to apply stress tests on their plants and Germany moved to switch off seven aging reactors. China and Switzerland have announced temporary freeze on new nuclear plants, pending overall safety review.France has 58 nuclear reactors producing two-thirds of the country's power. President Sarkozy said in a statement: "France has made the choice of nuclear energy, which is key to its energy independence and in the fight against greenhouse gases...I remain today convinced of the pertinence of this choice," Sarkozy said in a statement. "The lessons from the Fukushima accident will be drawn with a complete review of safety systems of our nuclear plants. This work will be made public,"
In the US, President Barack Obama continued to advocate nuclear power as an integral part of the U.S. energy matrix. However, he acknowledged the risks highlighted by the crisis at the Fukushima plants, and called for the need to constantly improve nuclear technologies to deal with additional safety concerns. Practically most countries with future or immediate set-up plans of nuclear plants have called for a halt and review in the midst of this crisis.
In hindsight, for a lesson to be learned, should such devastation occur in future, a quicker and more sensitive and transparent disaster management contingency plan should be adopted and coordinated globally with quick information shared. In essence, everyone involved in nuclear science and technology should be committed to a culture of highest level of safety vigilance. Besides, the higher level of policy makers should adopt a pro-active regulatory oversight.
Nuclear energy is however, inherently dangerous. We can build nuclear reactors and claim that they are almost fool 'proof' but we cannot outwit natural disasters. Nuclear radiations are the most feared health risks. Exposure effects are multi-thronged and long term impairing cells, causing cancer and hereditary defects. Radioactive particles once leaked, will contaminate air, soil, water and plants even hundreds of miles away, aggravated by winds and rains.
Taking the Fukushima crisis as a lesson, nuclear energy may conveniently help to ease energy demands, but once nuclear catastrophe occurs, it may incur mega of liabilities and irreparable damages. There are renewable energy alternatives such as solar, wind, biofuel, biodiesel and hydro powers which are safer and cleaner. Other alternatives are the use of hybrid vehicles, high speed rail, energy efficient designs and public attitude to save the mother earth.





