Feeds Updates ..       Home Contact Sitemap Links
 
Home
Climate change
Climate extremes
Climate impacts
Greenhouse gas
Energy
Energy Renewable
Biofuel
Forest
Securities
Methane
Kyoto Protocol
Copenhagen COP15
CDM
Carbon Credits
China
Africa
United States
S.E.Asia
Calculator
Sustainability
Sustainable You
High Speed Rail
Hybrid Vehicle
Tribute to Chow Kok Kee - Chairman Chow
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

                                                                                                                 
                                                          October 22, 2011      

You are here:
Home» Energy Fossil» IEO Outlook » China Coal» CCS» Renewables » Nuclear Energy
» Hybrid Vehicle

 

 

 

Nuclear Goes Green?  Who'd Have Thought!

The Fukushima Nuclear Crisis

The risks and rewards of nuclear energy

 

The former US President G. Bush at a renewable energy conference in Oct. 2006 at St. Louis, said, " Nuclear power is renewable."

Is nuclear energy renewable energy?

Uranium is not renewable, and the mining of uranium is a very polluting industry. Nuclear waste needs thousands of years of storage requirements.

Neither coal nor nuclear can be considered renewable or clean, when compared to the emissions or wastes from energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies.

 

 

 A Nuclear Power Plant in China


Fear of repeat of nuclear plant accident
like that of Three Mile Island in 1979 and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 hampered the construction of new nuclear plants in many countries.


The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant
exploded in the Soviet Union in 1986, subsequent fires sent nuclear radiations into the atmosphere over an extensive geographical area. The radioactive fallout was 400 times more than from the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. It was the worst nuclear plant disaster in modern history.
 

   
Ukraine paid homage on Monday to the victims of the
Chernobyl disaster while still struggling with the legacy
of the world's worst nuclear disaster 24 years ago.
   

 

Subsequent radioactive contaminations were extensive. Over 300 000 people were evacuated, and many are still suffering from long lasting genetic defects. Everything local and nearby, from health to agriculture was contaminated. Agriculture and dairy products, water resources were declared unsafe for and bans were imposed from worldwide. Cover-up made by the relevant authorities made it difficult to assess death and damages. The overall cost of the disaster is estimated at US$200 billion.

 

The accident at the Three Mile Island Unit 2 nuclear power plant near Middletown, Pennsylvania, on March 28, 1979, was the most serious in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant operating history, though no deaths, injuries or hazard casualties were detected.

The accident was caused by a combination of personnel error, design deficiencies, and component failures. It has permanently changed the nuclear industry and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Public fear and distrust have led to NRC's broader and more robust regulations, more careful scrutiny and analysis on management of the nuclear plants. This in turn has reduced the risk to public health and safety.

 

Having languished for decades, nuclear energy’s prospects are improving in the urgent quest for other cleaner, greener energies options:

There are signs that concerns about global climate change are beginning to affect the world fuel mix. In recent years, many countries have begun to express new interest in expanding their use of non-carbon-emitting nuclear power, in part to stem the growth of greenhouse gas emissions. The IEO2008 reference case projection for electricity generation from nuclear power in 2030 is almost 4% higher than the IEO2007 projection, which in turn is 10% higher than the IEO2006 projection.

 

The World Nuclear Association projected that, global nuclear plant set up will reach one per every 5 days by 2015 with 1000MW capacity; as compared to one every 17 day since 1980. This is with special reference to the developing countries especially China ( 2% ) and India (3%), experiencing their rapid economic growth. In 2008, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) predicted that nuclear power capacity could double by 2030, though that would not be enough to increase nuclear's share of electricity generation. According to IAEA, the top 10 countries with the highest nuclear share of total electricity generation are all located in the European countries. France, for instance, generates 76% of its electricity from nuclear.

 

What is the rationale behind the nuclear power comeback?

Nuclear power offers significant emission reduction over coal. Every 22 tonnes of uranium used gives 1 Mte emissions reduction. Taking a lifecycle view, nuclear has a lower carbon footprint than hydro and other renewables. Nuclear power is considered a base load power source, as its output is nearly constant.

Nuclear plants have low incremental fuel cost, and so are run at full output and achieve a 90% capacity factor. The 1973 oil crisis had a significant effect on countries which had been relying heavily on oil to switch to other alternatives like going nuclear.

Despite the above credentials, the most feared aspects of nuclear power generation, of course, lies in the apprehension of radioactive leakage and the thorny issue of nuclear waste disposal. Even the slightest leakage can cause long lasting detrimental genetic impacts for generations!  So far there is no technology to come up with a long term safe disposal or storage.

Hence, the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) was founded in 1989 after the Chernobyl accident. It is an international organization aimed at fostering international cooperation and professional excellence within the nuclear industry. Every organization that operates a nuclear generating station is a WANO member.

Through WANO, maximum safety and reliability level of the operation is ensured by exchange of information via communication and comparison.

 

The changes reflect a generally more favorable perception of nuclear power as an alternative to carbon-producing fossil fuels for electricity generation. However, in the pursuit of nuclear energy as an option to fossil and renewable fuels, the numerous issues related to risks need to be tackled. These include lack of trained personnel and capability in handling the technology, the risk of mishandling and theft of radioactive nuclear material, the problem with radioactive waste disposal and the health hazards that could arise from exposure to radioactive nuclear material such as cancer and birth defects.

 

But these favorable perceptions of nuclear energy may change.

Has the world underestimated the risks of nuclear power?

On 11-march 2011, a devastating earthquake of Richter scale 9.0 struck the northeastern part of Japan. Subsequent tsunami with waves reaching heights of 10 m hit the Island of Fukushima, 240 km north of Tokyo. The twin natural disasters have left more than 10,000 people dead or missing. 
 
 
Explosion at one of the nuclear reactors in Fukushima on Japan's worst quake of
9.0 on Richter Scale and worst tsunami with waves reaching 10 m, March 2011
 

This crippled the cooling systems (in almost all 6 nuclear reactors) needed to keep nuclear fuel from going into full meltdown. That would cause the much feared nuclear explosions resulting in the release of radioactive radiations.

The nuclear accident was the worst since the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine in 1986, and the worst nuclear crisis in Japan since the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Unlike the Chernobyl explosion which happened in the midst of nuclear reaction; in Fukushima, three reactors were automatically shut down and the reaction stopped when the earthquake occurred. But the failure of the cooling systems in all the six nuclear reactors soon raised the temperatures and pressures rapidly, and to-date (17 March 2011), 4 reactors experienced explosions of different degrees at different stages.

The Whole World is Watching Japan's 6 Nuclear Reactors in Anxiety and Fear
 
CNN-Google picture showing:
the 6 damaged nuclear plants in Fukushima, north-east of Tokyo. Crews have struggled to control since Japan's devastating earthquake and tsunami a week ago, amidst radiation fears in a country racing to avoid a full-on nuclear crisis. Latest fire was discovered Wednesday morning (17-March-2011) in the No. 4 reactor building at the Fukushima Daiichi plant.

Prime Minister Kan said dangerous levels of radiation had spread from four reactors of the Fukushima nuclear plan. Other than the calls to increase the evacuation radius from 10 kms, then 20 kms and finally 30 kms from the epicenter of nuclear catastrophe, details of the information on the causes of nuclear failure, prevalent radiation levels and progress of rectification were limited.

People were frustrated and angry, doubting the level of transparency and fearing the worst case scenario of completely melt down, a disaster that could emit large amounts of  radioactive contamination. Panic swept Tokyo after a rise in radiation levels of 40 times normal levels was recorded. Some locals, tourists and many foreigners scrambled to leave the country, while others stockpiled food and supplies. Multinational companies considered relocation outside Japan. Many countries imposed travel warning to Japan. Other  precautionary measures taken included screening of travelers from Japan, testing of almost all Japanese food imports and banning of certain categories. Shipping industry has become increasingly nervous about sailing into the highly contaminated Japanese waters.

Nuclear experts have been warning that Japan was underplaying the severity of the nuclear crisis. Officials later admitted that at least 3% of the fuel in 3 reactors had been severely damaged, suggesting partial core melt-down. Japan on 18 march 2011 finally acknowledged the 'gravity and severity' of the nuclear crisis. Its nuclear rating agency raised the rating of the nuclear accident from Level 4 to Level 5 on a 7-level international scale. That put it on par with the 1979 Three Mile Island accident.

The International Nuclear Event Scale defines a Level 4 incident as having local consequences and a Level 5 as having wider consequences. This raised alarms at the neighboring countries like China, the Philippines, Korea, Russia, Hawaii and California. By the third week, radiations had been detected over these countries as these radiations drifted across territories.

These series of fires and explosions at the nuclear plants in Fukushima of Japan have revived doubts regarding the growth of nuclear power industry globally. The crisis has prompted many countries to boost safety checks at nuclear plants. European energy officials agreed to apply stress tests on their plants and Germany moved to switch off seven aging reactors. China and Switzerland have announced temporary freeze on new nuclear plants, pending overall safety review.

France has 58 nuclear reactors producing two-thirds of the country's power. President Sarkozy said in a statement: "France has made the choice of nuclear energy, which is key to its energy independence and in the fight against greenhouse gases...I remain today convinced of the pertinence of this choice," Sarkozy said in a statement. "The lessons from the Fukushima accident will be drawn with a complete review of safety systems of our nuclear plants. This work will be made public,"

In the US, President Barack Obama continued to advocate nuclear power as an integral part of the U.S. energy matrix. However, he acknowledged the risks highlighted by the crisis at the Fukushima plants, and called for the need to constantly improve nuclear technologies to deal with additional safety concerns. Practically most countries with future or immediate set-up plans of nuclear plants have called for a halt and review in the midst of this crisis.

In hindsight, for a lesson to be learned, should such devastation occur in future, a quicker and more sensitive and transparent disaster management contingency plan should be adopted and coordinated globally with quick information shared. In essence, everyone involved in nuclear science and technology should be committed to a culture of highest level of safety vigilance. Besides, the higher level of policy makers should adopt a pro-active regulatory oversight.

Nuclear energy is however, inherently dangerous. We can build nuclear reactors and claim that they are almost fool 'proof' but we cannot outwit natural disasters. Nuclear radiations are the most feared health risks. Exposure effects are multi-thronged and long term impairing cells, causing cancer and hereditary defects. Radioactive particles once leaked, will contaminate air, soil, water and plants even hundreds of miles away, aggravated by winds and rains.

Taking the Fukushima crisis as a lesson, nuclear energy may conveniently help to ease energy demands, but once nuclear catastrophe occurs, it may incur mega of liabilities and irreparable damages. There are renewable energy alternatives such as solar, wind, biofuel, biodiesel and hydro powers which are safer and cleaner. Other alternatives are the use of hybrid vehicles, high speed rail, energy efficient designs and public attitude to save the mother earth.

 

   
Loading...

References and related news:

International Atomic Energy Agency http://www.iaea.org/
International Energy Outlook 2008

Insight to Fukushima engineering challenges: World Nuclear News.org

Safety Mechanisms of Nuclear Power Plants: nuclearinfo.net
The Three Mile Island Accident: Nrc.gov
Energy Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Eia.doe.gov
Nuclear Power Information: Usasearch.gov
Niger to Build Nuclear Plant in Medium to Long Term
Nuclear Power in India : WNA
China Embraces Nuclear Future - washingtonpost.com May 2007
U.S. Now Sees Iran as Pursuing Nuclear Bomb - Los Angeles Times Feb 2009
Russia to Complete Iran's Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant on Time Feb 20, 2009
Nuclear Power - Are We Ready: Thestar.com.my

What Is A Nuclear Meltdown: news.yahoo.com

 

You are here: Home» Energy Fossil» IEO Outlook » China Coal» CCS» Renewables » Nuclear Energy » Hybrid Vehicle

                                                                                                                                                   Top »

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Feeds Updates ..       Home Contact Sitemap Links