|
|
|
|
Bioethanol in Brazil In the mid-1980s - before any other country even thought of the idea - Brazil succeeded in mass-producing biofuel for motor vehicles: alcohol, derived from its plentiful supplies of sugar-cane. Brazil produced 15.9 billion liters of bioethanol in 2005, more than one-third of the world’s supply and second only to the United States. Brazil and the United States together account for 70% of the world's total ethanol production. But Brazil is the largest exporter of ethanol with an export of near while US is a net importer. Export in 2007 amounts to almost 20% of its production of 5.5 billion gallons, and accounts for almost 50% of the global exports. Export is expected to double to 11 billion gallons by 2012.
(Left): World ethanol production (Mgal/year) for 2006, showing top countries and Rest of the world (RoW) (Right): Production trend and imports (Mgal/year) in the US
A report released by Oxfam in June 2008 criticized biofuel policies of rich countries as neither a solution to the climate crisis nor to the oil crisis, while contributing to the food price crisis. The report concluded Brazilian sugarcane ethanol though "far from perfect" is the most favorable biofuel in the world in term of cost and GHG emissions. In Brazil, the bioethanol substitutes half of the gasoline that would be used if it did not exist and cost is competitive without subsidies. That has been accomplished in 30 years since the Brazilian Ethanol Program was launched in the 1970s to reduce the dependence on oil imports. By then Brazil had already more than 40 years of research in blending ethanol with gasoline for light vehicle. In 1979, the first vehicle fuelled with 100% hydrated ethanol was introduced.
Today, all 35,500 service stations in the country sell hydrated bioethanol and gasoline-bioethanol blends. Pure gasoline is no longer commercialized at the retail level anywhere in the country. The development of this distribution infrastructure resulted from strong political will and support from fuel distribution companies, dating back in the early days of implementation.Ethanol emits less carbon dioxide than gasoline because it burns with a greater efficiency. The use of anhydrous ethanol reduces 2.7 kg carbon dioxide per liter of ethanol. Blending is made viable through cost effective manufacturing of the ethanol, facilitated through the use of modern boiler and turbine technology, more scientific farming for higher yield, cheap stock feeds (sugarcane), higher utilization of excess bagasse. It is estimated that between 1975 - 2005, the use of hydrated ethanol in light vehicles prevented the emission of 644 million tons of C02. This achievement has been acknowledged by the IPCC. Such acknowledgement has also boosted the auto industries. Today, most car manufacturers produce models capable of using the new fuels. In the car owner manuals, benefits of ethanol in gasoline are emphasized, the like of enabling excellent performance, reducing emissions and improving air quality. Sales of flex-fuel vehicles increased to 75% of the total cars sales in 2006. Flex-fuel vehicles use variable % blend of hydrated ethanol with gasoline, mandated between a minimum of 20% to a maximum of 25% of ethanol.
Brazilian government is currently looking for new overseas markets in South Korea, Japan and European Union which has mandated a 5% biofuel use by 2012 and 10% by 2020.
"Brazil’s ethanol and biodiesel
programs are a benchmark for alternative and renewable fuel
sources,"
President Lula of Brazil wrote for the Economist.
"Partnerships are being established with developing countries seeking to follow Brazil’s achievements—a 675m-tonne reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions, a million new jobs and a drastic reduction in dependence on imported fossil fuels coming from a dangerously small number of producer countries. All of this has been accomplished without compromising food security, which, on the contrary, has benefited from rising agricultural output...We are setting up offices in developing countries interested in benefiting from Brazilian know-how in this field.". Most of the world’s biofuel is extracted from corn in the United States, sugar in Brazil, and both grain and oil-seed crops in Europe. A new report by the British government cast fresh doubt on fuels made from crops as a way to the fight climate change. Studies have shown that the current generation of biofuels — reliant on food crops like canola, corn and soybeans — drives up food prices by using agricultural land, as well as aggravating deforestation, and may be worse for the climate than conventional oil once the cost of production and transport are taken into account. Concerns has been raised over the ability of sugarcane, corn, together with palm oil, rapeseed, soybean, and other vegetable oil sources to fulfill the demands of both the traditional and renewable fuel sectors in a sustainable manner. There are also doubts that, in the quest for greater agriculture output, if there is definite greenhouse gas benefits along the entire life cycle of the raw material.
References and related news:
Ethanol fuel in Brazil - Climate
Action 2007-8 |
| You are here: Home » Renewable Energy » Wind » Solar » Hydro » Three Gorges Project » Biofuel » 2nd Generation » 3rd Generation » Rapeseed » Bioethanol » Biogas » Landfill » Waste Management » Geothermal » Sustainability |